|
A model that has signaled every major change of direction for the US markets over a 27 year period...
(With enough warning to re-position our investments)
Former broker relies on Shepherd...
"... been in the market since 1958
and was a broker from 1967 through 2001 (34 years). You are the best in the
business."
Jim Shepherd is the only strategist in the investment field who:
NOTES TO PERFORMANCE DATA The returns depicted herein are approximate returns that would have been achieved if an investor had placed an equal amount of money in each of the 30 DJIA stocks as of the model's buy signal in 1982 and followed the directives of the model as to subsequent investment positions to the present. No guarantee of any kind is made that any individual could have or would have achieved these precise results. These data are for illustrative purposes only and should not be relied upon to make investment decisions. You should carefully consider your own situation before making any investment and you should consult with your own investment advisor in order to determine the suitability of any investment discussed herein or in any material presented in the future. No guarantee of future results is given or implied and the company and its agents are not in the business of rendering investment advice. The returns depicted herein simply portray approximately what could have been achieved if an investor had exactly followed the directives of the model at the precise time each signal was generated and no warranty is made that any future results would be similarly profitable. These returns are based on the assumption that an investor would have received dividends during the periods when invested in stocks. There is no provision made for commissions or other fees or expenses in any of the data. When out of stocks pursuant to signals in the model, profits that would have accrued included capital gains on Treasury Instruments and interest payments received on said instruments. It is assumed that all dividends and interest receipts were immediately reinvested into similar investments. An investor should not rely on these returns as being predictive of any future outcome. All investments carry risk. Notes to the chart above:
Know in advance, before any major movesDeveloping a Major Change Model .gif)
My early losses in the stock market were the key to my later success. Looking back, I feel extremely fortunate in having had a serious set-back in my early investing life. I lost money in the stock market by following a few of the so-called gurus of the time. Although my losses were modest I vowed this would never happen to me again. That was over 32 years ago. Thirty-two years ago, I took a trip I regretted. I bought into some of the "market myths" offered by a highly regarded broker and a couple of respected market commentators. It was an unprofitable trip into the market that caused me to vow, "Never again." As a result of my stock market losses, I worked day and night to correlate market data with the underlying economy. Through my work, it became clear that what the brokers and media were telling us was old news, and I had been suckered. After six years of study, I developed a model that accurately predicted every major change in the U.S. markets going back 100 years. So, the financial loss I regretted at the time in the late 1970s, began my personal growth towards becoming proficient on the market and eventually started my investment newsletter service. And something else happened that was curious. I discovered the key to success wasn't necessarily which stock to pick; it is the ability to anticipate the market and know which sectors to be in at any given period in time, or when out of the market, which asset class to be in. Changing Asset ClassesIn October 1999 my model signaled the end of the great bull market for stocks. It was also saying it was time to switch sectors to T-Bonds - and my model was correct again. We stepped out of bonds near the high in early 2008 with a 91% profit (see graph #1). So What Have We Done Lately?Our subscribers benefited nicely in 2008 with no losses and up 22.96% (see graph #2 below). We anticipate even greater returns in 2009. 
UPDATE IMAGE Graph 2 needs little blue 2008 box put on it Jim Shepherd's Major Change Model
100% accurate in predicting every major move in the equity market since 1982. 
"Buy & Sell" following our signals vs. other indices from 1982 through August 2009, starting with $10,000. Proof the Shepherd model works: $10,000 in 1982 worth $741,159* today, a huge 599% gain over that of the DJIA. *Does not include the huge gains from the 1987 crash. My Major Change ModelWhile I won't disclose the details of what my model looks at in order to signal how I anticipate the next big swing, I will tell you when -- with almost 100% accuracy. The model has caught every major move in the market -- up and down. My model has been dead-on for the past 27 years after being back-tested over 100 years. It analyzes a myriad of individual indicators including obvious ones like interest rates and inflation/deflation data. For example, before the 2000-02 meltdown began we had already exited stocks with a 4972% profit from the beginning of the bull market in 1982. You see, my proprietary model is emotionless. It doesn't panic in fear of what might happen. It doesn't become greedy and it doesn't listen to the market spin that we hear every day. As you know, fear and greed lead to costly mistakes! My model digests raw data and provides me with a window into what's about to happen in time for my subscribers to re-position to protect themselves or benefit. The '87 CrashWe sold all stocks three weeks before the 1987 crash and then made millions buying put options. On average the members of my then-pool turned $10,000 into $640,000, with one making just over $1 million (after fees and commissions) in the 1987 crash, when put options that cost $200 each were sold on Oct. 19, 1987, for $30,000 each (approximate values). Read 1988 article about Jim Shepherd's '87 crash prediction. Jim Shepherd
.jpg)
America's #1 Independent Consistent Wealth Builder and the Advisor's Strategist As an independent authority, and founder of The Shepherd Investment Strategist, a service of JASMTS Inc., Jim has made money for this service consistently every year for the past 17 years. His subscribers didn't lose any money in the 2000-02 or 2008 Bear and were recently up over 114% since safely moving into another asset class. We soon expect to make an adjustment to how our funds are presently deployed, which we expect will bring another significant increase in value. Jim Shepherd's Early Personal Story of Frustration - necessary to bring his later huge success in the market follows: "My early losses in the stock market were the key to my later success. Looking back, I feel extremely fortunate in having had a serious setback in my early investing life when I lost money in the stock market by following a few of the so called "gurus" of the time. This came after I had already made my first million dollars in real estate development. Although my losses were modest I vowed this would never happen to me again. I worked night and day and weekends in my time off for years while attempting to correlate various market data with the underlying economy. Through this research it quickly became clear to me that most of the suggested purchases by brokers were already old news to many and I had been suckered (yes, just like brokers in recent years, problems occurred and brokers went to jail then also!). Being an inquisitive type, I found the work exhilarating. I became fascinated with the markets and soon thereafter left real estate development and went into the options and futures brokerage business. I continued working on my project for years until I started to see a pattern developing in some of the data. Eventually, after almost six years I had developed a model that had accurately predicted every major change in the U.S. markets going back over a 100-year period. The excitement was almost overwhelming. I began using the model while advising my then-clients in 1986 after using it personally since 1980. In the summer of 1987 it began warning about approaching problems and I informed my followers. Some were skeptical, but many took my advice and followed my investment recommendations that made a number of them millionaires on Oct. 19th 1987. Most made 64x their money. One follower, who happened to be the owner of a hair salon, made just over $1 million from his $10,000 investment (both after fees and commissions). Not only did the model get my then-clients out of the market well in advance of the crash, but it positioned us to benefit from the collapse of stocks." Signal BEFORE 2000 MeltdownIt was just after my signal in late 1999 that the Feds pumped $50 billion into the economy, ostensibly to prepare for the uncertainty of Y2K. I realized that this infusion may delay the drop in the market (similar to what the Bush tax incentives and real estate refinancing accomplished to a greater degree in 2003-06 and other machinations in 2008), but I could not go against my model. It had never been wrong. Sure enough, on Jan. 14, 2000, the Dow peaked and the NASDAQ began its plummet in March, losing over 80% of its value by October 2002. Most professionals said their indicators were pointing up while mine were pointing straight down! The late October 1999 signal and its direction had me move my subscribers out of equities and into long bonds resulting in a 10% gain even BEFORE the NASDAQ started coming apart. Why T-Bonds?...You might ask. Primarily because my model foresaw and predicted the time to sell stocks and buy T-Bonds. Stocks had become a speculative bubble and were unsafe. And despite what the Fed and the financial media had been saying that inflation was a threat, my model was warning that the odds of deflation were growing and we prepared for that possibility long before it became popular. A deflationary period is very likely dead ahead and we're awaiting such a signal in my model. As a subscriber, you will be among the first to know. And if things change and the model predicts a different outcome, not knowing will cause huge losses to portfolios that are incorrectly positioned. There is one very valuable tool that is confirming my assertion that the economy is very weak and definitely not in recovery mode. It has also been confirming that real inflation is not a problem and the likelihood of deflation continues to be the greater threat. That tool is the Treasury Bond market, a market that is so large it dwarfs the stock market by a 10-to-1 ratio. The long-end of the Treasury Bond market has been signaling falling inflation over most of the last many years and wasn't being fooled by the financial media's assertions that higher energy prices were causing inflation (in fact, higher oil prices are like a tax on consumers). So, despite that we side-stepped bonds temporarily, I believe the best is still to come for one of my presently favored investments: T-Bonds. As the various attempts to stimulate the economy continue to flounder, the problems will filter over into the $multi-trillion derivatives market. When it begins to really melt down, the Fed will be forced to increase their volume of purchase of U.S. govt. 30 yr T-Bonds to force rates lower. At that time, as stocks begin to collapse, there will be a rush to one of the only safe havens - the T-Bond market - where we will see some further excellent capital gains. Delayed But Not Denied!I'll tell you why your broker, the Fed and the media are wrong about the market today and why the odds of a deflationary spiral and final crash are very high. The stock market experienced the largest bubble in recent economic history during the 1990s. It's a historical fact: all bubbles must be followed by a complete wash-out before a new bull market can be born. Too many investors believe Wall Street's assertion that the 2000-02 Nasdaq swoon was that wash-out. It wasn't! And 2008's fall, although not surprising to my subscribers, was still not it. A wash-out was, and has been, delayed by actions of the government and the Federal Reserve attempting to avoid the inevitable. In the early part of the decade, the Fed drove down interest rates allowing many who otherwise could not afford to buy homes to do so and those who had lost their jobs were able to treat their home equity as their own personal ATM giving a false sense of well-being to the economy. Then in early 2008, with further cracks showing, the government began on its present course of tax incentives and bailing out the "to big to fail." The course the government began on will ultimately fail because even governments cannot continue to borrow to pay old debts without serious ramifications (China recently delivered notification of this and our bond market took note). The tools to deal with this have been in place for decades: the FDIC to deal with banks, and bankruptcy courts to deal with troubled firms, with other private investment money standing by to pick up the pieces at albeit newly set, realistic market prices. Unfortunately, these tools were largely ignored, to our future detriment. "The stock market is the place to be."
Wall Street and the media are lyingThink about it. The Wall Street establishment has some powerful motivators for brokers and analysts in the form of billions of dollars received in salaries, bonuses, commissions and fees. In the never-ending quest to increase sales at any cost, Wall Street analysts and brokers who are often supported by commentators from the financial media must produce new reasons to buy or they lose their jobs. The various media continuously place a positive spin on negative data as it is in their self-interest to do so. A symbiotic relationship exists as media companies make billions and billions of dollars in ad revenue from the brokerages and other firms they are reporting on. And, don't ever forget how brokers make their money - telling you what stock to buy and taking a commission on the transaction. They generate profits by buying and selling investments - it's that simple. We have heard from hundreds of subscribers who told us that they were naive to think that their broker was doing them a favor by telling them they should be in stocks at all times. That's not what we do. There are times to be invested in stocks and times to be in other types of investments. Results: 17 years of consistent profits. 2008 MeltdownNo, 2008 wasn't the crash. My model says it's still coming! The 2008 selloff was no surprise to us and we profited from it (see graph #2 above). Sadly, most investors suffered steep losses because of deceptive headlines that were designed to keep them in the dark. Unfortunately, Wall Street's devious practices, aided by many in the financial media, continue in 2009 in the form of more...
Deceptive Headlines
Here are three examples that (most likely) unbeknownst to you are probably responsible for 90% of your losses in the market! DECEPTIVE HEADLINE EXAMPLE #1: "XYZ corporation's earnings beat the street"It's been a common practice of companies to feed a lowered expected earnings number to investment journalists, but when the actual earnings number is released, surprise surprise, it comes out to be one cent higher than the lowered number they had fed the media. What they neglect to tell investors is that although they exceeded this year's lowered expected earnings number, this year's actual earnings is lower (lately much lower) than for the same period the previous year! That is probably the most common form of deception practiced by Wall Street, and it has surfaced again in the earnings reports for 2009. And there is none more deceptive than those currently being issued by some of our largest banks. However, now they're adding new wrinkles to their old game. Goldman Sachs changed the dates of its quarter from January to March, thereby eliminating a $1.5 billion loss in December. Then there was the new tactic employed by both JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup that reported eye-popping profits because the price of their bonds had dropped, meaning they could theoretically redeem them at a cheaper price. Selling assets and then showing the funds derived from the sale as revenue showed up in the Bank of America's statement after it sold its shares in a China construction bank for a one-time profit. By selling that asset, B of A eliminated any future potential for ongoing revenue, but fooled many investors into thinking their revenue had actually increased by the amount of that sale. That allowed B of A to blow away its lowered earnings estimate of four cents a share. However, a closer look at the bank's real earnings showed that two cents per share was closer to the truth than even that "four cent, Wall Street, beat the street" estimate. DECEPTIVE HEADLINE EXAMPLE #2: "Housing gets Street started"Hard-to-find good advice
"... how much I appreciate
(Jim) ... It is difficult to obtain straight-forward advice and
commentary on the markets and the economy in these confusing times."
The April 2008 housing numbers showed an increase in starts that led many to believe, "the housing bust was over" and investing in stocks again would lead to new fortunes. Investors who jumped back into stocks based on headlines trumpeting rising housing numbers soon regretted those decisions. A closer look revealed that the housing numbers for multi-family homes increased slightly - which would be expected after 12 straight monthly losses - and the overall picture of housing starts showed they had fallen by 50% over a 2-year period. An even more disturbing statistic is home foreclosures for July 2009 showing that 1 in every 355 households has received a foreclosure filing (up 32% from a year ago). And that does not include homes that banks are reluctant to foreclose, since doing so would impair their own capital requirements and possibly force their closure by the FDIC. DECEPTIVE HEADLINE EXAMPLE #3: "Sub-Prime Mortgage Problems Contained"...I re-subscribe every year...
"... I re-subscribe every year
to keep in touch with your proven indicator signals."
(This one helped set investors up for losses in 2008.) When defaults and foreclosures created chaos among sub-prime mortgage companies, Wall Street was quick to point out the Fed's Sept. 18 and Oct. 31, 2007 rate cuts had solved the economy's credit crisis (here in mid 2009 we're seeing even more emergency measures that I believe will be just as futile as previous efforts). The credit crisis had been created by years of poorly-planned lending practices wherein loans were granted to people who had a demonstrated history of not making their payments on time, allowing them to purchase overvalued homes with little or no down payment and in some cases overlooking fraudulent income reporting on loan applications. However, lenders were not worried because they ostensibly believed that as home prices rose, these new homeowners could simply refinance indefinitely in order to meet their obligations. By mid-2006 real estate values had peaked in many areas and the facility that had allowed for these borrowers to continually refinance in order to stay afloat was evaporating. Defaults and foreclosures began mounting and by July 2007 the ramifications of years of poorly thought-out lending practices started the global financial crisis. Rapidly increasing defaults and foreclosures, first evident in the risky sub-prime arena, had spread to loans of borrowers with lower-risk credit scores. And then the financial difficulties of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae only under-scored these problems. We warned in the summer of 2007 that the potential damage to the economy resulting from our growing credit crisis had the potential to make the last Savings and Loan debacle seem tame by comparison. "They told me I was crazy..."Every time my model delivers a signal I get a reaction from subscribers, mostly disbelief. Especially when it's a sell signal. In October 1999 I told my subscribers it was time to sell all their stocks and lock in their profits, just like my earlier sell recommendations in 1998, 1994, 1990, etc. Yes, I was going against conventional thinking and I sure did hear from my subscribers! Phone calls, e-mails, faxes, they told me I was crazy and some walked away -- many to return later but with less money. Sure, there's a certain comfort level in going with the crowd. But that's not the way to maximize profits and protect your investments. Sometimes being out-of-sync is exactly where you need to be. Thanks to my model, my subscribers and I made money.
Three pivotal forecasts that can protect and grow your portfolio!
And now, as I mentioned earlier, my model is warning that a market crash is likely just around the corner -- a crash that could impact your assets much more significantly than the NASDAQ collapse of 2000-02, and certainly more than the 2008 sell-off... if you're not prepared. That's not all. My analysis also points to three additional potential crises that threaten your portfolio. Take a look. FORECAST #1: Deflation could cause real estate prices to crash
Why Subscribe?
Now I am generally not a doom and gloom type, but from what I follow and see, I believe that the economy will hit a deflationary cycle in the near term. The value of most assets, stocks, commodities and real estate will plunge even further. Home prices across the country will likely fall by more than 50%! Japan is a prime example. Deflation hit there in a significant way shortly after their stock market began down in 1989 and continues to dog their economy. Real estate fell 50%+ with commercial down almost 80%. Looking back at our own history, real estate values in the 1930s fell similarly. The Federal Reserve's attempts to pump up the money supply and re-liquefy the economy proved ineffective as will the more recent TARP money plus undisclosed others. Despite TARP, credit remains tight. Debt is now at record levels for individuals and many corporations. Too many investors today make the same mistakes: they don't study history and they get caught up in the excitement of the crowd, following what everyone else is doing. FORECAST #2: An economic collapse would see enormous gains in U.S. T-BondsI continue to monitor the opportunities to re-enter the U.S. T-Bond market. Three forces could contribute to large gains for investors. First, as the economy weakens further, long-term interest rates will continue lower, in anticipation of a further slowdown of the economy. Second, a collapse of the stock market would cause a flood of funds into T-Bonds seeking a safe haven. Third, as we suggested would happen several years ago, the Fed has recently begun buying long-term U.S. Treasuries to drive interest rates down, one more prop in their attempt to avert an economic collapse. As of mid 2009, they have purchased $300 billion in Treasuries. FORECAST #3: Sub-prime problems will continue to spread
...It has saved me a lot...
"I congratulate Mr. James A.
Shepherd in predicting the market direction... it has saved me a lot of
money. Thanks."
The sub-prime debacle that has caused hundreds of billions in losses has come as no surprise to the subscribers of The Shepherd Investment Strategist. Although the losses are substantial, I believe we have only scratched the surface and there is unfortunately much further to go. My warnings began in 2006, and I continue to warn subscribers in 2009 about the perils involved in owning any of the debt of dubious value being sold by banks or other financial institutions in the form of mortgages or Certificates of Deposit. The next shoe to drop will involve credit card debt (also commercial loans). Unfortunately, many, hoping for a turnaround in the economy, have been using their credit cards to live. In my newsletter, I explain these coming events and investment strategies in detail. And this is just a small sample of the insights and forecasts you'll receive when you subscribe to The Shepherd Investment Strategist. Remember, I'm an investor first. My model was developed to assist me with my investments, which are the primary source of my income. I put my capital on the line every day (and I don't mean as a day trader!) based on the direction that comes from a model I developed years ago and continue to perfect - although 100% accuracy on major moves is hard to beat. Right now my model is predicting the possibility of a market crash that is ready, willing and able to suck up my personal fortune, and yours, too.
A deadly crash is headed our way. I'm not about to lose money. In fact, I'm
going to make money on it and you can, too!
You have several choices in the weeks and months ahead: First, you could get out of the market now and put yourself into cash. When I think of the millions - and I mean millions - that my subscribers would have missed out on had they just gone to cash instead of the asset class I directed them to go into - specifically, T-Bonds - in 1999, it is painful to imagine. And staying in T-Bonds through the 2003-05 move up in the stock market proved to be the correct positioning. Using the projections from my model, I took them right up to the edge of the bear market. Not too soon. Not too late. Another option would be to trust your broker, get more aggressive with your investing and buy the stock du jour. It keeps brokers enjoying expensive vacations. The brokerage houses buy ad space and this allows Madison Avenue ad executives to live in marvelous mansions -- yet it could send you to the poorhouse! Your third and best option is to invest in The Shepherd Investment Strategist and receive time-tested analysis - without bias or a hidden agenda. I either grow your capital or you don't renew. Just how far down is down?Historically, a market will drop at least 40% from its high. And, while that number is significant enough, in Japan, the Nikkei lost 60% of its value in 1989 and by 2003 had plunged a breathtaking 80% - way below that historic 40% figure! And we're already beyond that! This plunge will be greater. Can you afford to lose 50% of your capital, let alone 60% or 80%? - as happened with the NASDAQ loss of 80% as recently as 2002 - it is still down 60% from its highs of 2000! These are truly unnerving numbers. MISSION
"My mission is as it has been
for 27 years: to grow and protect your investments."
The DJIA and S&P, where most money in stocks resides, have not yet shown the same erosion. They soon will and more. Could it happen again in 2009? Yes, and my model is saying it's very close. Now is the time to prepare your financial future for the upcoming crisis. By subscribing NOW you will get advance notice of this next crucial signal, while there's still time to act, and amass further profits! We made 22.96% in 2008 and are predicting significantly greater returns in this next drop. And when the bottom is finally reached, which it will be eventually, will you know? When I issued my "buy" signal in 1982 nobody wanted to believe. It will be the same this time. Huge profits will again be made getting back in at the real bottom. Can I use it in my IRA?... 401K or Mutual Fund? If your family of funds allows it, you can transfer from one asset class to another based on our recommendations. A 90-day Full Money-Back GuaranteeBottom line? As a new first-time subscriber you have 90 days to decide if The Shepherd Investment Strategist is for you. If not, I will refund every penny you paid. No questions asked. And you may keep all reports received to that date! That's three full months to read and reap the benefits. That's three times longer than most other newsletters allow. After all, with my own money on the line, I have an added incentive to make sure I get it right. Why Buy The Shepherd Investment Strategist?
.jpg)
Stuart Harper, Publisher Imagine a model that can tell you in advance when to exit before large down moves in the market and when to get back in before the market begins its next major up leg without having to worry about buying into a false bottom! Few are able to successfully time the market. This has facilitated the ease with which the media and brokers convince the public that the market cannot be timed. Those who have followed this newsletter for the past 17 years (supported by Jim Shepherd's superb timing model of 27 years) know different: each year has been profitable. Jim has proven the falsity of the "buy and hold" mantra. The brokers need the public to stay in stocks as that is the only way they make money - through commissions. The media, paid off with billion dollar advertising campaigns by the brokers, parrot the same self-serving messages, to the detriment of investors. The recent 2008 meltdown was a surprise to most. Jim knew what was coming and held his subscribers in T-Bonds, exiting in March 2008 with a 91% profit. He then made a number of recommendations to take advantage of the meltdown making a 22.96% profit in 2008. This drop, just like the 2000-02 demoralizing sell off, devastated savings and retirement plans, college preparations, and many large company pensions' plans. Below I've outlined some other major calls. 2000-02 sell off. Although that was termed a high-tech meltdown (as the DJIA and S&P 500 did not drop as far) it was still a $7 trillion dollar washout. Jim's exit signal in late 1999 indicated the environment had changed. As the market began its drop in early 2000, Jim's subscribers had locked in their huge profit from the 1990s run up and were already up 10% in T-Bonds. 1998 Asian Contagion Jim exited most stocks a week before this began. He re-entered equities in the fall of 1998 and rode the market up 30% to his exit in late 1999. Crash of 1987. As far as I know, Jim was the only strategist who called the 1987 crash with enough time to make preparations to profit from it ... and profit he and his subscribers did! His model issued a crash warning signal just over 2 weeks before the crash. On Oct. 19 Jim liquidated, garnering on average 6,400% of their initial investment, with one making just over 100 times their money (after fees and commissions). Those profits brought his then-followers important benefits, such as peace of mind to an unemployed, injured logger, money that allowed a store owner to retire and pass his business to his son, and over $1,000,000 (after fees and commissions) in profits from a $10,000 investment for a hairdresser. Crashes are rare events. I know of only two other authorities (both well-known) who claimed they predicted the 1987 crash. One gave the signal after the market closed on Friday, Oct. 16, which of course was too late to take action, because the drop began at the open on the following Monday, Oct. 19. The other later claimed that he did not want to say anything because of what his comments might cause to happen! On occasion Jim uses leverage, as he did in 1987. A few other examples with returns that his then followers realized were: 10x their money, in 1991 and 5x in 1994 and again in 1998. He uses leverage about once every 6 to 7 years. Often other competing experts will have you attempting one leveraged play after another hoping to average out. That is not what Jim does. Why not try Jim's NO RISK offer for 90 days?As a first time subscriber, if you're not completely satisfied, we'll refund every penny you've paid! All you need to do is contact us in the first 90 days. 10 Ways to Tell if The Shepherd Investment Strategist is for You You shouldn't be without The Shepherd Investment Strategist if you want:
What you receive:
And of course you have my RISK FREE, no questions asked, full 90 day unconditional Money Back Guarantee - for first time subscribers. That's 100% of your money back if within 90 days you are not fully satisfied. So... if your portfolio is worth say $500,000 dollars (and for some it is more and for some it is less) then an investment of only $495 per year as an insurance plan is less than 1/10th of 1 percent... some may spend that on brokerage fees for one trade! When looked at that way, this is the most inexpensive 'trade' (really an investment) you'll likely ever make! This is especially true when you take into account the losses that will be sustained if you were to be caught in another drop like 2000-02 or 2008. Remember, I will tell you everything you need to know to get out of the market well in advance of any major downturn, and back in before the next up-leg (ensuring you don't buy into a false bottom!). Secure your financial future today. Put losses like 2000-02 and 2008 behind you and consistent profits going forward each year in any market condition. If you wish to order at this time you may:
Yours in profitable and safe investing, .gif)
P.S. I've written about inverted yield curves and their amazing ability to forecast recessions. However, it is important to realize that the recent cessation of the yield curve inversion does not mean an end to the recession. Rather, the collapse in rates, at the short end of the curve (making for a very steep yield curve) signifies a "flight to quality" mentality that exists amongst the investing public, and tells us much more economic weakness is ahead. P.P.S The "talking heads" are at it again, trying to convince investors that the crisis is behind us. Believe that at your financial peril! My Triple Guarantee
|